When I created my Soundcloud I wanted to put my better tracks there, and offer them for download. Well, currently I consider .:To the Sky:. and .:Nightlights:. my only good tracks. There's no way I was going to just leave my SC with 1 track until I got the motivation to finish another one, so I waited until I was done with .:Nightlights:.
The problem with .:To the Sky:. was.. it was rushed. It actually has no mixing/mastering, no reverb, and half of the song is constructed on .wav files. .:Nightlights:. had a lot more time put into it, people thought the mixing was good, had a lot of originality, used chords, used advanced automation, etc.
But somehow, on my SoundCloud..
...:To the Sky:. has 7 likes and a download and .:Nightlights:. has a repost. Now, trust me, I'm not complaining. It's satisfying people like .:To the Sky:. so much, it's one I like as well. It's just confusing that a rushed track stood out more than a track that had effort put into it.
So let me ask you readers something, if you've listened to both tracks-- which one do you like better?
DiamondEclipse
I like "To the sky" better, cause when i hear nightlights, my ears try to hide themselves ;-;
BlueAlpha14
Is it because the chord progression is too high pitched?