00:00
00:00
BlueAlpha14
Some dubstephile who tries his hand at making his own. I also help out reporting stolen stuff to the Audio Portal Cleanup thread. Hablo español. Pero, no soy perfecto.

Age 22, Male

Washington, USA

Joined on 12/27/15

Level:
8
Exp Points:
625 / 710
Exp Rank:
> 100,000
Vote Power:
5.03 votes
Audio Scouts
4
Rank:
Portal Security
Global Rank:
23,825
Blams:
51
Saves:
368
B/P Bonus:
8%
Whistle:
Deity
Trophies:
1
Medals:
1,372

I'm sorry but I have to ask-

Posted by BlueAlpha14 - July 25th, 2016


When I created my Soundcloud I wanted to put my better tracks there, and offer them for download. Well, currently I consider .:To the Sky:. and .:Nightlights:. my only good tracks. There's no way I was going to just leave my SC with 1 track until I got the motivation to finish another one, so I waited until I was done with .:Nightlights:.

The problem with .:To the Sky:. was.. it was rushed. It actually has no mixing/mastering, no reverb, and half of the song is constructed on .wav files. .:Nightlights:. had a lot more time put into it, people thought the mixing was good, had a lot of originality, used chords, used advanced automation, etc.

But somehow, on my SoundCloud..

5655099_146947092033_Screenshot122.png

...:To the Sky:. has 7 likes and a download and .:Nightlights:. has a repost. Now, trust me, I'm not complaining. It's satisfying people like .:To the Sky:. so much, it's one I like as well. It's just confusing that a rushed track stood out more than a track that had effort put into it.

So let me ask you readers something, if you've listened to both tracks-- which one do you like better?


Comments

I like "To the sky" better, cause when i hear nightlights, my ears try to hide themselves ;-;

Is it because the chord progression is too high pitched?

yes

Ah, well.